The importance of truly connected clinical practice

Primary sleep disorders are substantially more common in patients with mental illness than in the general population¹ yet often go undetected.

The relationship between sleep and mental health conditions is bidirectional. For example, poor sleep increases the risk of developing depressive or anxiety disorders.² Individuals with insomnia face more than two-fold higher likelihood of developing clinical depression compared with those who sleep normally.³

Those with residual insomnia after major depressive illness have an increased risk of relapse and recurrance.⁴ Importantly, treating sleep disturbance is actually therapeutic. Active treatment of sleep disturbance and disorders in conditions such as PTSD, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia has been shown to meaningfully improve the symptoms and control of the condition.^5-9

Conversely, many mental health conditions directly destabilize sleep. Most patients with depression experience insomnia or hypersomnia, while those with anxiety often struggle with sleep disturbances and difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep.^10,11 As poor sleep worsens mental health, mental illness impairs sleep, forming a self-reinforcing vicious cycle.

How our system fails these patients: The coordination gap

Despite the deep interconnectedness of sleep and mental health, clinical practice remains siloed because existing systems were not built for and do not support collaboration.¹²

Psychiatrists often lack access to practical sleep testing pathways and must rely only on subjective reporting. Primary care providers (PCPs) and general practitioners (GPs) are expected to triage everything, often burying sleep concerns under competing priorities. And finally, sleep physicians often see patients only after symptoms escalate enough for referral, leaving early opportunities missed.

There is a lack of standardized protocols or guidelines for when or how PCPs/GPs, psychiatrists and sleep clinicians should refer, co-manage or hand back patients with overlapping sleep and psychiatric symptoms. Moreover, when one clinician initiates a change (for example, starting PAP therapy or adjusting antipsychotics), the impact on the other domains is rarely tracked or fed back into a unified care plan.

Patients move between primary care, psychology, psychiatry and sleep services with fragmented assessments, duplicated histories and conflicting care plans. The outcome is sadly all too predictable: a pattern of underdiagnosis, misattribution of symptoms and treatment plans that address one part of the problem while leaving core drivers untouched.

If we want better outcomes, we need a team-based model. Not as an aspiration, but as standard practice.

Integrated care models

A number of models have been developed around the world, such as the American Psychiatric Association’s Collaborative Care Model (CoCM), which offer practical, evidence-backed templates for structuring coordination across primary care, mental health and specialty services.

A number of models have been developed around the world, such as the American Psychiatric Association’s Collaborative Care Model (CoCM), which offer practical, evidence-backed templates for structuring coordination across primary care, mental health and specialty services. CoCM connects PCPs/GPs, psychologists, allied health professionals and consulting psychiatrists through shared registries, defined protocols and scheduled case reviews.¹³

This structure translates well to a sleep–mental health pathway by adding a sleep specialist to the team for patients flagged with sleep disorders.

With sleep disturbance emerging early and frequently in psychiatric illness, primary care is the natural front door for screening and triage. Embedding sleep and mental health assessment tools into every relevant evaluation, alongside standardized referral triggers and pathways, can help achieve earlier specialist assessment and multidisciplinary intervention, leading to better outcomes.

Collaborative care advantages aren’t theoretical. The value is backed by nearly 80 randomized trials showing improved outcomes across mental health conditions like depression and anxiety when compared to non-collaborative care.¹⁴

The path to integrated sleep–mental health care: What needs to happen

For primary care, sleep medicine and mental health care to be treated as truly interconnected, clinicians and system leaders need to adopt structures that make coordination routine rather than optional.

Actions needed from clinicians and clinical bodies

• Embed routine sleep assessment (brief screening tools, red‑flag criteria, restless leg syndrome, narcolepsy, chronic insomnia) into psychiatric and primary care guidelines.
• Raise awareness of sleep health interconnections in undergraduate and postgraduate training, and in continuing medical education (CME) and other health-practitioner education programs.
• Define clear referral triggers for treatment nonresponse, disproportionate cognitive impairment or persistent sleep complaints.

Actions needed from health system & administrative leaders

• Tie quality metrics and performance goals to integrated outcomes such as reduced time to diagnosis, improved sleep scores, fewer medication changes and fewer repeat visits.
• Build unified care pathways linking primary care, psychology, allied healthcare, psychiatry and sleep medicine with consistent screening, testing and follow-up steps and ensure its ability to operate whether the entry point is psychiatry, primary care or sleep medicine.
• Fund protected time and reimbursement for cross-specialty case conferences and e-consults.
• Commission pilots that co-locate or virtually integrate sleep and mental health services, with explicit scale-up plans if predefined outcome and cost metrics are met.

Why integrated care pays off

For clinicians, a coordinated, team-based model strengthens diagnostic accuracy and improves treatment stability. It ensures care is holistic and coordinated, addressing all components of a patient’s presentation to support a more complete treatment plan and better outcomes.

For health systems, integrated care reduces avoidable visits, diagnostic delays, readmissions and unnecessary medication adjustments. It improves efficiency and logically leads to better long-term outcomes across the network.

When sleep is treated as a critical, foundational driver of mental health, clinicians have clearer holistic perspective, patients respond better to treatment and systems operate more smoothly.

The bottomline

Sleep and mental health cannot be effectively managed in isolation. The biological links are too strong, and the cost of missed diagnoses and sub-optimal treatment is too high.

A team-based care model is not just an ideal. It is the only approach that makes sense. It is time for psychiatrists, psychologists, allied health professionals, sleep physicians and PCPs/GPs to work as one. Patients are counting on us to connect the dots and build a system that treats their whole health, not just isolated symptoms.